we talked about actions being acceptable to society and to state. certain collective actions might be acceptable to both and others may be to one of the two. we discussed about gang wars being beneficial to both society and state. but how far should we let this stretch. such activities are illegal though beneficial to the society and state on the whole? aren't they unethical too?
also, is it right on our part to let things continue they way they are in this context?
I shall relate it to the debate on capital punishment. Though this is a milder issue but concerns ethics and law in the same way...where to draw the line is the question we always end up with!!
But in the end there are no answers!!
Dr. Rajat Chabba
28032
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
1 comment:
capital punishment is a far graver issue than my friend can ever think of and connecting this issue with collective action does not sound appealing at all.first of all one should know what is he talking about before commenting on the topic
Post a Comment