Tuesday, January 19, 2010
amul and politics
As per the article in gujarat their is limited role of politics in milk co-operative which means their is deep conspiracy of politics to de- politice the milk co-operative,by small number of higher class....whatever the case in maharastra atleast democracy prevails in co-operative, people have stronger say in it.....which is better ? can be have a case in which politics and management are well mixed?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
1 comment:
As far as amul is concerned if elected representatives have not much say in various operations due to its technological complexities, this doesn’t mean that it is not so better. Soul of a co-operative lies in how the members perceive themselves. Still farmers considered themselves it as their own dairy and all technocrats as worker. Whenever they have realized that they are getting less patronage, they have conveyed it. If it is working successfully and members have no grievances there is no need of undue politicization.
Post a Comment