Thursday, February 11, 2010

"Live-in Relationships and Dowry - Should we or shouldnt we?"

 
If you thought that being in a live-in relationship would save you from being punished for demanding 
order that can expand the rights of women in live-in alliances, the Supreme Court has 
turned down the plea of Koppisetti Subbarao who had disputed the dowry charge pressed by his live-in partner on the ground that they were not married. 
  WHAT IS YOUR OPPINION ON THIS ISSUE?

1 comment:

MDG said...

First of all, I would like to know how this topic is related to collective action? Secondly,I think there are many factors that a person would consider to be more important than saving himself from palimony- the correct term for the money demanded by one of the live-in partners like compatibilty, affordability and last but not the least testing the waters.