Often, when you see a leader unable to do his job OR circumstances within the group itself forcing him/her to let go, it becomes the responsibility of a few 'genuinely interested' people to take on the leadership role and make sure that the values for which the group was formed in the first place, aren't compromised.
My curiosity is this: "How does that group decide who takes the role of leader as everyone now knows what being the leader entails?"
I think, sometimes you have to rise above your own self and do something that not many would agree with.
3 comments:
Well many people start enterprises but can everyone attain the stature of Mukesh Ambani????? In the same way everyone knows about leadership but not everyone has the quality of leading a mob. no doubt leadership can skills can be brushed up but one needs to have a natural flair for it but is inherent and only few gifted people possess it.
Rashi(p30031)
Well, it's not about having the skills or reading self-help books to get them! I think everyone has their own style and it depends a lot on your willingness. What i'm talking about is people who have it in them and are also perceived as such by some in the group, but they have their own set of 'priorities'...
Leadership involves finding a parade and getting in front of it.-John Naisbitt
The parade is in place, the right person just needs to come forward
a leader doing everything single handedly is not so common phenomenon. And if it is done by a whole group consisting some genuinely interested people one need not to be a leader in a true sense. take the initiatives in the field you feel, you are better off from others and allow other to do the same.
Post a Comment