In today's world we rate the success of a person on the basis of his/her financial status. The more wealth a person has, the more successful he is considered. But should financial status be the only criteria? Why not also take into consideration parameters such as, his family life, morality, education, interpersonal skills, health, etc? If we take into consideration all these parameters then very few or almost negligible number of people will come under the category of successfuls. And it should be like this because then only being successful will get the valuation it deserves.
SHASHVAT SINGH (30044)
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
3 comments:
Does this come under the purview of "collective action and cooperation"? How?
i do support Uphar.
even if it does not.. i think it is more of a blog then a grade minting machine.. people who post 'irrelevant' ,do so in spite of knowledge that they'r not 'making' anything out of it.. so let the fun continue and people worry about 'relevant' and "irrelevant" .
and oh i forgot.. once a wise man said,"honesty pays,but it doesn't seem to pay enough to some people".Talk of rural managers wanting placements in..well..u know..
Post a Comment